Published by Derek Moore on 13 Jan 2009 at 09:13 am
Story time, kids… For Christmas, I got a new laptop. I had needed one badly, and I managed to get a deal on Black Friday that was too good to pass up. I mention this because, on the laptop was .. Windows Vista. Something which heretofore, I had never personally used. Now, normally, as a computer geek, I would use the latest and greatest. And as a programmer, I need to be on the forefront of this type of stuff. But I had heard so much junk about Vista, that I was hesitant to use it, especially on my primary machine.
After using this laptop for over 6 weeks, I’ve been happy with Vista for the most part. Despite all the naysayers out there, Vista isn’t that bad. It’s definitely prettier, makes XP feel old. But, it does come with a price…
Vista is a complete memory hog. Even after I got rid of HP’s crapware on the laptop, the amount of Windows services that run in Vista is simply staggering.
So, during PDC in October ‘08, the new head of Windows, Steven Sinofsky, showed off a netbook running 7 … in 512 MB of RAM! As soon as I saw this, I decided I had to try 7 as soon as it came out.
So, now that day is here. In addition to installing it on a rusting bucket of bolts, I decided to also install it dual-boot on my main desktop PC. For the record, my main desktop PC is only about 6 months old. The parts in the case are these:
- CPU: Core 2 Quad Q6600, overclocked to 3GHz (no more, because I like quiet+fast)
- RAM: 2GB (2 x 1GB) PC2 6400
- GPU: Geforce 8600GT (yea, I know .. “meh”)
- HDD: 640GB SATA Western Digital
My initial impressions show Sinofsky to be right; the Core 2 Quad runs Win7 slightly faster than XP. And post install, it also used up about the same amount of memory as XP. Which is to say that 7 uses up far less memory than Vista.
Stay tuned. I’ve also got some thoughts about the new Taskbar for my next post.